Bitcoin Mining Energy Consumption Becomes A Blockchain Heated Debate


Launched in 2009 by “Satoshi Nakamoto,” whose identity remains unknown, Bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency to scale.

Since then, it has risen to prominence through high-security blockchain technology to provide an open-source alternative to institutional or government-backed currencies, the U.S. dollar.

Related Reading | Binance Bitcoin Open Interest Surges Despite Legal Scrutiny

The digital currency continued to operate on a stronger horizon than ever. As a result, early investors and miners who followed early cryptocurrency trends and held onto their assets have reaped huge rewards many times over.

Bitcoin Mining Energy Consumption Becomes A Blockchain Heated Debate

Bitcoin is finding trouble surpassing the 35k mark | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView

But here, the focus will be on why the decentralized currency has come to be under attack or been a subject of argument over environmental impact.

Issues on energy consumption have become the latest flashpoint for cryptocurrency. Many critics have donned the currency as an energy-consuming leviathan while friendly proponents debunk the accusation, hailing it instead for being less intensive in power consumption than the current global energy consumers.

Here, we take a careful study of the opposing views.

Arguments Concerning Bitcoin Mining Energy Consumption

Analysts from Cambridge University might also share the same perception with him, as the BBC has recently reported that bitcoin uses more electricity annually than the whole of a South American country -Argentina.

Regarding “mining,” the analysts claim that it is power-hungry, involving heavy computer calculations to verify transactions.

Related Reading | Thai Partner Drags Bithumb Hong Kong Subsidiaries To Civil Suit

The report by the researchers says it consumes around 121.36 terawatt-hours (TWh) a year – and is unlikely to fall unless the value of the currency falls either.

Another report also suggests that Bitcoin uses more energy than American Airlines, and each $1 billion in inflows is equal to owning 1.2 million cars — says Bank of America.

Elon Musk’s Affair

The impact of its mining activities on global greenhouse gas emissions was the major gripe and cause for Musk ending his love affair with bitcoin a few months back. As a crypto heavyweight, his argument weighs heavier on the debate.

In May, two months after his company started taking payments in Bitcoin, the Tesla boss announced that the firm would no longer accept cryptocurrency due to the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for bitcoin mining” concerns.

Proving Musk a significant player, the comment was quickly followed by a deep unconscious in bitcoin’s price.

However, the SpaceX central crooner’s latest tweet shows some hope for his love affair, dependent on  Bitcoin improving its renewable energy use.

The Argument Against Mining Less Inimical

According to BMC, a voluntary global forum of Bitcoin mining companies, the global industry’s sustainable electricity mix had grown to 56% during the second quarter, based on its “first-ever voluntary survey.”

Related Reading | PM Of Vietnam Orders Central Bank To Conduct Cryptocurrency Pilot Implementation

Kraken Director Dan Held also shared a similar idea on his Twitter, claiming the digital currency mining renewable energy use sits at 56%.

Research by ARK Investment Management discovered the Bitcoin ecosystem depletes less than 10% of the energy needed for the traditional banking system.

The cryptocurrency mining industry, which pooled almost $1.4 billion in February 2021 alone, is not yet unusually terrible for the environment compared to other aspects of modern life in an industrialized society.

Featured Image by Pixabay - Chart by TradingView

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *